Category: Blogs
What if one small, overlooked part in your line triggered leaks, contamination risk, and regulatory headaches? In plate heat exchangers (PHEs), the gasket is that tiny part with outsized impact—it keeps fluids separated, preserves hygiene, and sustains heat-transfer efficiency.
For procurement and maintenance leaders in food & pharma, picking the right gasket material isn’t just a spec decision; it’s brand protection, compliance, and total cost of ownership in one move.
PHEs stack thin plates (often stainless steel) with a gasket that seals channels, directs flow, and prevents cross-contamination—whether you’re pasteurizing milk, cooling temperature-sensitive vaccines, or sterilizing process water.
A mismatch between process conditions and gasket material can mean product loss, hygiene issues, energy waste, and unplanned downtime.
Figure 1: Simplified schematic showing the gasket’s role inside a plate heat exchanger.
When your production line is governed by strict FDA regulations, gasket selection becomes a strategic decision. Follow the points below for relevant material selection.
· Meet compliance (e.g., FDA 21 CFR 177.2600; EU 1935/2004).
· Resist microbial growth & chemical degradation from CIP/SIP.
· Hold up mechanically to clamping, cycling, and thermal swings.
· Deliver lifecycle value, minimizing leaks, re-tightening, and changeouts.
Figure 2: Typical temperature envelopes—match material to the hottest credible scenario plus CIP/SIP.
1. Define process conditions
Product(s), temperatures (normal & max), pressures, cycling, dwell, line speeds. Cleaning chemistry (CIP/SIP): alkali/acids, oxidizers, steam, frequency & contact time.
2. Screen by temperature
If your validated max temperature (incl. sanitation) exceeds a material’s limit, rule it out early.
3. Check chemical compatibility
Confirm resistance to both product fluids and every CIP/SIP chemical. Request a compatibility chart from your supplier.
4. Consider mechanical behavior
Look for a low compression set and a strong rebound to maintain seal force between services.
5. Verify certifications
Require FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 / EU 1935/2004, and where applicable 3-A, WRAS, NSF. Keep documentation on file.
6. Pilot & monitor
Where feasible, run a small-scale trial, then monitor clamp load, leak checks, and early aging indicators before full rollout.
Figure 3: High-level illustration (0–3 scale). Always use official vendor charts to validate your exact chemistry and concentrations.
EPDM shines for hot water/steam and many CIP acids; NBR for oils/fats at moderate heat; FKM for the hottest/aggressive regimes. Underspecifying heat tolerance causes hardening, cracking, and leaks.
EPDM: acids/steam/CIP friendly; avoid oils/fats. NBR: oils/fats/hydrocarbons friendly; weaker vs oxidizers & high heat. FKM: broad chemical and heat resistance; higher cost. Match both product and cleaning chemistries.
Materials with lower compression set retain sealing force longer, reducing re-tightening and leak risk.
FDA 21 CFR 177.2600; EU 1935/2004; 3-A/WRAS/NSF depending on use. Keep certificates.
Premium compounds can last multiple years in demanding duty; cheaper options might force 12–18-month changeouts—factor downtime, labor, and product risk.
|
Material |
Best For |
Typical Max Temp |
Strengths |
Limitations |
|
EPDM |
Hot water/steam, acidic fluids, dairies/breweries |
~150 °C |
Excellent vs heat/water/CIP; long life |
Not suitable for oils/fats |
|
NBR |
Dairy, edible oils/fats, sugary/hydrocarbon fluids |
~110 °C |
Great oil/fat/hydrocarbon resistance |
Lower heat & oxidizer tolerance |
|
FKM |
Extreme heat/aggressive chemicals |
~200 °C |
Exceptional heat/chemical resistance |
Higher upfront cost |
Even a perfect gasket fails if mismatched to the plate metal and the cleaning regime. Consider thermal expansion differences that can loosen seals during swings, and chemical interactions that spare stainless but degrade the elastomer. Coordinate plate metallurgy, product, and CIP/SIP as a system.
Document process conditions in RFQs: fluids, max temps, pressures, CIP/SIP details, frequency.
Ask for a pilot where risk is high; confirm no swelling, softening, or early leaks.
Vet supplier expertise in food/pharma; confirm certificates and changeout guidance.
Buy for lifecycle, not sticker price; the cheapest gasket can be the most expensive mistake.
· Buying on price alone → early failures & downtime.
· Ignoring chemical compatibility → swelling, cracking, failure.
· Not verifying certifications → audit exposure.
· Improper installation → torque to spec and train teams.
Figure 4: The “Goldilocks zone” for bolt torque minimizes leakage risk. Train teams and use calibrated tools.
In food and pharmaceutical manufacturing, a gasket may seem like a minor component of your plate heat exchanger, but it plays a major role in protecting your product and process. Choosing the right food-grade PHE gasket material is an investment in product safety, compliance, and efficiency.
By considering factors like temperature tolerance, chemical compatibility, necessary certifications, and supplier expertise, you can make an informed choice that safeguards product quality and keeps production running smoothly.
A gasket compound suitable for direct food/pharma contact that maintains a hygienic, leak-free seal and complies with regulations (e.g., FDA 21 CFR 177.2600).
Typically FKM for very high temperatures and harsh cleaning; EPDM is reliable for moderately high temps without oils/fats.
EPDM: heat/CIP friendly; avoid oils/fats. NBR: oil/fat/hydrocarbon friendly; lower heat/oxidizer tolerance. FKM: broad chemical & heat resistance; higher cost.
Ask vendors for certificates of compliance and keep them on file for audits.
Commonly 2–5 years, but lifespan depends on temperature, pressure cycling, chemicals, and maintenance. Inspect regularly and replace proactively.